![]() |
| Dior coat |
For some this is a simple, end-of-story decision: Are you kidding?
But if you have ever stroked a featherweight mohair Dior coat in a consignment store and wondered if it was worth the still-hefty price tag, read on.
I
imagine some luxury-goods customers don't fret if the things don't
return value, but I've known some mighty wealthy folks who refuse to pay
the freight for an item they consider substandard, overpriced or ugly. And why shouldn't they?
Whether you are buying a coat in a couture salon or Christie's Consignment, here are things to consider:
Is the quality really there, or just the label?
![]() |
| Anne Klein ca. 1980 |
Quality can slip; brands are sold, orders are filled by offshore jobbers, and the accountants decide the margins aren't high enough, so decree cheaper zippers.
For all the talk about "brand equity", a 30-year-old Anne Klein jacket was infinitely better quality than today's.
Do I value this?
A $600 pair of designer pants is thrilling to one woman and an egregious display of mindless consumption to her sister.
Value is a subjective assessment derived from various factors:
Value is a subjective assessment derived from various factors:
Label:
Does the brand have any worth to you, as a display of your image,
status or taste? Does the brand have meaning to you because of emotional
or symbolic connection? Barbara loves her Bulgari bracelet because her
mother wore a similar one.
Durability: Can you use and enjoy the purchase for a long time, because it is well-designed and made? Alice's mother first wore her Pucci dress in the '60s and it still looks striking.
![]() |
| McQueen iPad case |
Innovation: Is the style so cutting-edge that you derive satisfaction from having something fresh, new and unlikely to be replicated in cheaper versions? An iPad sleeve is not unique but a McQueen skull-buttoned one offers a bit more devil in the detail. Is it worth $250?
![]() |
| Cardin coat |
Provenance: A 1960 Cardin wool coat; (price $2,500 from 1st Dibs seller Jennifer Kobrin), is a stellar example of a late master's work.
Beauty: AKA the Purr Factor
Does it sing? Is the piece a high expression of the craft and aesthetic? Is it 'just right'? Jill said she cried the first time she tried on the ruby Beene dress that was a graduation gift from her father.
Does it fit in my life?
I
recently saw a 50ish woman in a Prada coat, rundown flats and cheap
vinyl bag. We all know that the head-to-toe designer is a bore, and you
can mix high and low, but luxury clothing demands a certain respect for the piece.
At the same time, I wouldn't forgo the pleasure of a beautifully-made object by making a knee-jerk judgment that it "must be overpriced". Just because I can't afford it doesn't mean it's overpriced, and the inverse is also true: what I can afford is not always fairly priced either!
![]() |
| You'll stand out |
In the end, your attraction to luxury goods comes down to your values and priorities. Some commenters said in the previous post that they want to upgrade and experiment with better quality than before, while others say they will admire, but not own.
The luxury brands hope many will
buy, either because they don't have to worry about price, or because
they desire it and will sacrifice. I'd only say, be wary about things
perceived as trophies. (What exactly do we win?)
Also, some of us have a luxe Achilles' Heel. For some that's accessories, for me, coats. I melt before a swath of cashmere with horn buttons or an immaculately-tailored topper.
Does luxury boost happiness?
I can't get a crisp correlation, maybe because I buy at the highest levels so rarely. A MaxMara coat delighted for nearly a decade, but for the move, I shed bags of Level 3 without a twinge.
I know women who can afford yet reject the finest and others who will exist on toast and tea to save for something special. Most of us inhabit a comfortable mid-ground, with a few "bests" and many basics.
Should you choose a luxury object, even as the rarest indulgence, I hope you are happy and serene with your choice. Clearly, I've been conflicted and intimidated by some of my own purchases. (Never pearls, though.)
Your comments on Part One fascinated me, and I would love to hear more.





14 comments:
Another thought-provoking post. Thank you.
Thank you for a nice taxonomy.
Just one point, though: Cardin is, I believe, still alive.
Yes, Cardin is alive and very crotchety.
I am not sure luxe, or any object designed for practical use, automatically demands or deserves respect. 'Fitting into' a lifestyle to me, is a matter of comfort and that the item won't be ruined than what people think about the items it is paired with.
I agree that the best way to go luxe is to find good, vintage items. Not all vintage is luxe, but most in terms of quality-for-money is a 'step up' from what you'd get for the price now.
It is so interesting; when I feel I am looking great... I almost derive more satisfaction seeing a luxe piece on someone else.
I do remember feeling very guilty purchasing two pairs of Bally heels one in black suede, one burgundy suede, the same style. This was about fifteen years ago;I cannot wear heels that high anymore even though I still have them.
xoxo
Karena
Art by Karena
Such good questions to ask. And yes, it does come down to values and priorities.
Sometimes, too much of a good thing dilutes its specialness. All the more reason (in my world) for only the occasional element of luxe, even during times when I could have afforded more.
As to the values and priorities, that includes what we wish to pass along to our children - not the material, but the way to lead quality, meaningful, joyful lives.
I have a vintage Pierre Cardin LBD and I love it. It was my MIL's and had it altered to fit. Just wore it to her 85th birthday party, and she was delighted. What this has to do with anything, I don't know. But, anyway, it felt luxurious on so many levels.
Your post is inspiring and has me pondering my thoughts of luxury.
I agree that Max Mara coats are pure luxe.
I have tried them on but never owned one. I have a friend who has 3 and she looks amazing wearing them.
Pearls, cashmere and a few Hermes scarves are as close to luxury that I can afford.
The most expensive coat I ever purchased was a nut coloured cashmere that I still wear and still adore. However.... every single button fell off at one time or another and had to be replaced, something that never happened with my less costly purchases. Go figure.
The most expensive coat I ever purchased was a nut coloured cashmere that I still wear and still adore. However.... every single button fell off at one time or another and had to be replaced, something that never happened with my less costly purchases. Go figure.
Couldn't live without my pearls - definitely not luxury. But as for clothes, whatever makes someone bien dans sa peau is can be justified. However, one can look fabulous if well groomed and feeling confident, despite the price tag.
Bon weekend
Bravo. Quality and not the name nor origin are the factors that count :}
This quote comes to mind........
"To live content with small means; to seek elegance rather than luxury, and refinement rather than fashion, to be worthy, not respectable, and wealthy, not rich; to study hard, think quietly, talk gently, act frankly, to listen to stars and birds, to babes and sages, with open heart, to bear all cheerfully, to all bravely await occasions, hurry never. In a word, to let the spiritual unbidden and unconscious grow up through the common. This is to be my symphony."
William Henry Channing (1810-1884)
So I have realized that luxury tires me out:). It has to be selectively experienced or attempted.
Post a Comment